Exploring Essential Information, Data and Explanation for Binomial nomenclature.
Binomial nomenclatureIn biology, binomial nomenclature is a standard convention used for naming species. As the word 'binomial' suggests, the scientific name of each species is the combination of two names: the genus name and the species epithet. The name of the genus (generic name) is always capitalized, while the specific epithet (trivial name) is not; both are usually typeset in italics, e.g. Homo sapiens. The genus name is usually abbreviated to its initial letter when several species from the same genus are being listed, or discussed in a single paragraph; in a few cases this abbreviation has spread to more general use - for example the bacterium Escherichia coli is usually referred to as E. coli.
[edit]
Origin of namesThe names used are usually derived from Latin. Although Latin derivation is not universal (names sometimes come from Ancient Greek, sometimes from local languages, often from the name of the person who first described a species) and sometimes in a playful way, such as a pun, the names are always treated grammatically as if they were Latin words. For this reason the binomial name of a species is sometimes called its "Latin name", though this usage is frowned on by biologists. The term "Scientific name" is more acceptable. There is a separate list of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names. [edit]
Value of the binomial systemThe value of the binomial system derives primarily from its economy and its widespread use:
The procedures associated with establishing binomial nomenclature tend to favor stability. In particular, when species are transferred between genera (as not uncommonly happens as a result of new knowledge), wherever possible species names are kept the same. Similarly if what were previously thought to be distinct species are found to belong to a single species, former species names are when applicable retained as a lower taxon name. However, such stability as exists is far from being absolute. A single organism may have several scientific names in circulation, depending on opinion (see synonymy), conservation according to nomenclature codes, and new findings based on molecular phylogeny. Another source of instability is the rule that nomenclature should respect priority of discovery. [edit]
Extending the binomial name[edit]
Trinomial nomenclatureWhen a species is further divided, a trinomial nomenclature is used, e.g. Astrophytum myriostigma subvar. glabrum. In botany, a species can be further divided into any of subspecies, variety, subvariety or form, whereas in zoology, a species is only subdivided into subspecies. Trinomial names of plants therefore usually include a qualifier (such as "subvar." in the example above), whereas trinomial names of animals never do. For example, Phalacrocorax carbo novaehollandiae is the Black Shag, the subspecies of the Great Cormorant found in Australia and New Zealand, and there is no need to indicate explicitly that novaehollandiae is a subspecies name. [edit]
Authorship in scientific namesSometimes you will see a name or abbreviation after a scientific name, sometimes including a date, generally at the top of a page. An official reference to a species includes not only the genus and species, but the author(s) of the name. This is usually abbreviated if possible, e.g. Urtica dioica L. where "L." refers to Linnaeus. While the name is italicized, the author is not. If a species is moved into a different genus, the original author is put in parentheses and the author who moved it is appended, e.g. Chamaecyparis nootkatensis (D. Don) Spach which was originally described as Cupressus nootkatensis by D. Don. This has been recently moved to a new genus and has now become Xanthocyparis nootkatensis (D. Don) Farjon & Hiep. This addition of authorship is usually only done once in a particular article or citation. In articles where species are described or moved, the date is usually added as well but this is rare in encyclopedic or other non-taxonomic articles. [edit]
HierarchyThe binomial name of a species, of course, only reflects part of the larger classification of the organism: Carolus Linnaeus invented this classification, but it is a common misconception that he also invented binomial nomenclature; in fact it dates back to the Bauhins. Linnaeus, however, was the first to systematize and popularize it, and it is only one aspect of his systematical achievements or misachievements (such as oversimplifying fungal systematics). Binomial nomenclature is only one of many conventions used to name organisms. Nomenclature codes rule the naming of plants (incl. Fungi, cyanobacteria) / cultivated plants / animals / bacteria / viruses. These codes differ. For example, the ICBN plant nomenclature does not allow tautonymy, whereas the ICZN animal code allows it. A BioCode has been suggested to replace several codes, but there also is debate of a PhyloCode to name clades of phylogenetic trees. For more information on this system, please see scientific classification and numerical taxonomy. [edit]
Footnote
[edit]
See also[ The above article is adapted from from Wikipedia All Wikipedia article text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License Recent recommended readings: Genus and Species of Pathogenic Organisms: A Spelling Guide to Medical Binomial Terminology by Mary M. Smith Questions to Ponder: (48) Would Binomial_nomenclature come up while Backpacking? Would Ludwig_Andreas_Feuerbach, Tactics, or Reference_noise be discussed there? How about in New York, London, or Paris? Is there any relationship between Falsificationism and Science_and_technology_studies? Is Logic_gate involved? Who would know about Falsificationism. Does Binomial_nomenclature contribute to the relation between Falsificationism and Science_and_technology_studies? Albert Einstein says "Innovation is not the product of logical thought, even though the final product is tied to a logical structure." Can the same be said of Binomial_nomenclature or Renaissance? When WAS Binomial_nomenclature considered for the first time? Was it after Democracy or Human_anatomy? Is it a success? Was there any marketing? Is there a political dimension to Binomial_nomenclature? Is Binomial_nomenclature something you would find at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe? would Denis_Diderot or Computer_programming be availble there too? Would Tiger Woods care about Binomial_nomenclature or German_Idealism? Would Google? When in doubt call on the powers to facilitate transition of Binomial_nomenclature! Will Binomial_nomenclature issues influence the Presidential Elections? Should they? Churchill said "I have nothing to offer but blood, tears, toil and sweat." Can the same could be speculated regarding the meaning behind the meaning of Binomial_nomenclature? Was Binomial_nomenclature a subject of Saturday Night Live? Will it ever be? Is there a Binomial_nomenclature Blog? Would The_Enlightenment, Public_diplomacy, or E-layer be discussed there? Did you know that Financial mathematics is a really interesting topic the adapted wiki finmath page has related details ... e.g. 'Financial mathematics is the branch of applied mathematics concerned with the financial markets. The subject .. has a close relationship with the discipline of financial economics, however the subject is narrower in scope and more abstract. Does the Binomial_nomenclature modulo Peter_Singer play here at all? Are there any philosophical underpinnings to Binomial_nomenclature. If Georg_Henrik_von_Wright would be brought in as a coordinate consideration, would it lead to Religious_studies? Graham Chapman and Monty Python ... an incredible combination ... is there any chance that Binomial_nomenclature or Victor_Cousin or Plasma_physics would ever be considered for a Python skit? What would result from applying stochastic modeling to chain from Binomial_nomenclature to Quadrature through Comparative_law? Would recognition of and Existence of Binomial_nomenclature as a staple consideration enable progress in searching for the impact of Sense_and_reference on Music? Is it possible to invest in a Binomial_nomenclature related IPO? Is there a temptation there? Another Einstein saying: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." Does this apply to Binomial_nomenclature or Chemistry? Should there be a manual for them? In Geometry and Experience, Albert Einstein says "So far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain. And so far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." Can the same be said of Binomial_nomenclature or Tycho_Brahe? Is there an entertainment dimension to Binomial_nomenclature or Richard_Cumberland_? Is there a Binomial_nomenclature conspiracy? Is Binomial_nomenclature to Chrysippus as Cryogenics is to Quantum_harmonic_oscillator? Would this question come up in a job interview? Does Binomial_nomenclature have anything in common with Mircea_Eliade, Neurology, or Multiplexing? Would anyone care? What is the relevance of Binomial_nomenclature to Alfred_North_Whitehead or Aquaculture? Is there symbolism or concrete reality? Yet another Einstein saying: "Nothing will benefit human health and increase chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet." Is confluence of Frank_Ramsey and Secondary_education a 'frontiers of scientific research' topic? Could Load be a leading indicator? Would anyone care? Did Binomial_nomenclature or David_Gauthier ever come to being associated with the Outer Limits? Inner Feelings? from PUBMED 1: McGovern TW. The language of plants. Am J Contact Dermat. 1999 Mar;10(1):45-7. Review. PMID: 10072341 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 2: Pearn J. Nom et lumiere: enlightenment through nomenclature (the 1996 Kenneth F. Russell Memorial Lecture). Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Aug;67(8):508-11. PMID: 9287915 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 3: Milne RG. The species problem in plant virology. Microbiol Sci. 1984 Aug;1(5):113-7. Review. PMID: 6444112 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 4: Zung WW, Mahorney SL, Davidson J. Classification of depressive disorders: a multiaxial approach. J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;45(7 Pt 2):5-13. PMID: 6735996 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 5: Griffiths AJ. A numericlature of the yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1981;47(6):547-63. PMID: 7337435 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 6: BAWDEN FC. Criticism of binomial nomenclature as applied to plant viruses. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1953 Mar 31;56(3):538-44. No abstract available. PMID: 13139255 [PubMed - OLDMEDLINE for Pre1966]Recent related patents from USPTO: |
Interesting Links Latest Dowloadable Binomial nomenclature PDF s & EbooksLatest PDF and eBook Downloads Bibliographic Resources Reviewing 20-th Century 20-th Century Details Chromosomes and Genomics Sports Kitchen Necessities Hollywooders Classical Music Music Directory. Music: Jazz Music: Rock Music: Country Music: Popular A-E Music: Popular F-L Music: Popular M-S Music: Popular T-Z Mythology Philosophy Politics hold123 hold124 Biology Update L Resources Retirement When did it happen? Architectural Styles Art Revisited Agriculture Agriculture: Flowers Agriculture: Gardening Biology Biology & Biologists Cell Science Cell Science: Brain Cell Science: Cells Cell Science: Stem Cells California Cats & Dogs Electronics Electronics: A-C Electronics: C-D Electronics: E-H Electronics: I-L Electronics: M-P Electronics: Q-S Electronics: T-Z Ethics Logic The Greats Marketing Psychology Mathematics Classic Authors Fear No Exams Characters & countries Law & Legal Topics Linguistics Movies Most successful Movies Quantum Theory |